Aspirin vs. Marijuana

References: http://www.onmarijuana.com/2007/03/24/marijuana-is-safer-than-aspirin/ and http://www.saferchoice.org/content/view/24/32/ This is a repost with a few edits… When Bayer introduced aspirin in 1899, cannabis was America’s number one painkiller. Until marijuana prohibition began in 1937, the US Pharmacopoeia listed cannabis as the primary medicine for over 100 diseases. Cannabis was such an effective analgesic that the American Medical Association (AMA) [...]

Federal judge blasts Putnam treatment facility

http://lohud.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080709/NEWS01/807090370/-1/newsfront Courtesy:  LoHud.com By Terence Corcoran The Journal News • July 9, 2008 A federal judge yesterday blasted representatives of a for-profit mental-health company that treats young adults with psychiatric problems at two Putnam County facilities for lobbying former patients to opt out of a multimillion-dollar class-action lawsuit brought against the company. U.S. District Judge [...]

West 57th KIDS and Straight Inc., Virgil Miller Newton exposed

Video Exclusive! httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrlFzv5x2Sw httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1KKnFTZVnI

Drug War Casualties

Thursday, May 23, 2002 By Radley Balko Samantha Monroe was 12 years old in 1981 when her parents enrolled her in the Sarasota, Fla., branch of Straight Inc., an aggressive drub rehab center for teens. Barely a teen, Samantha also had no history of drug abuse. But she spent the next two years of her [...]

Recent Articles:

US: Torture Should Not Go Unpunished

November 13, 2010 Human Rights No Comments
Failure to Prosecute CIA Abuses Sends Wrong Message

(New York) – The US government is wrong to not criminally prosecute CIA officials who destroyed evidence of torture, Human Rights Watch said today. The televised statements of former President George W. Bush acknowledging his personal responsibility for ordering torture demonstrate the need for the Obama administration to pursue prosecutions of senior US officials responsible for planning and authorizing the torture and ill-treatment of detainees, Human Rights Watch said.

Acting US Attorney John Durham, who is also in charge of an ongoing investigation into improper interrogations of detainees, announced today that he would not pursue criminal charges for the destruction of CIA videotapes showing interrogations of terrorism suspects. “It is beyond shocking that a former US president can publicly claim responsibility for torture and the next day the US government can say it will not pursue charges for destroying evidence of that torture,” said Joanne Mariner, Terrorism and Counterterrorism Program director at Human Rights Watch. “It sends the ugly message that there are no legal consequences in the United States for committing the most heinous of international crimes.” The destroyed videotapes showed the torture of detainees Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri while they were being held in a secret CIA “black site” in Thailand in 2002. The tapes were reportedly kept in Thailand until November 2005, when Jose A. Rodriguez, then head of the CIA’s clandestine service, ordered them to be destroyed. Rodriguez reportedly claimed responsibility for the destruction of the tapes, asserting that CIA lawyers had authorized his order. Bush, in an interview televised on November 8, 2010 similarly claimed that Justice Department lawyers had said that waterboarding and other abusive interrogation methods were not illegal, giving him the go-ahead to order the practices.A report from the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility issued in February 2010 found that the key lawyer responsible for such legal opinions had “violated his duty to exercise independent legal judgment and render thorough, objective and candid legal advice.”

“To say that Justice Department lawyers gave their okay to clearly illegal methods of torture and ill-treatment is a lame excuse,” Mariner said. “It simply shows that the lawyers themselves were derelict in their duty to uphold the law.”

The investigation of the CIA’s use of these abusive techniques is ongoing. Durham, the special prosecutor assigned to the videotape destruction case by former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, had his mandate greatly expanded in August 2009, when Attorney General Eric Holder appointed him to carry out a preliminary review of abuses against CIA detainees. The focus of the review is on so-called “unauthorized” interrogation techniques – practices that went beyond what was allowed under legal advice provided by the Justice Department at the time.The overwhelming weight of evidence of criminal abuses ordered by senior officials and committed by the CIA makes a full-scale criminal investigation into senior-level responsibility for these practices necessary, Human Rights Watch said. Human Rights Watch expressed concern that the current investigation seemed unlikely to look up the chain of command to senior-level officials who ordered, conspired to commit, or were complicit in torture or ill-treatment.

To date, the Obama administration has shown little enthusiasm for any of these steps. President Barack Obama has repeatedly expressed a reluctance to “look backwards” at alleged crimes committed during the previous administration. He has specifically ruled out prosecuting CIA agents who committed abuses that the Justice Department advised were lawful, even though torture is a serious crime under both US and international law. Under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which the US ratified in 1994, a government is obligated to submit cases of torture “to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution …. These authorities shall take their decision in the same manner as in the case of any ordinary offence of a serious nature under the law of that State.” The US anti-torture statute imposes criminal penalties for torture committed by US nationals whether in the US or abroad. Human Rights Watch said that the US record on accountability for detainee abuse has been abysmal. Human Rights Watch has collected information regarding some 350 alleged cases of torture and ill-treatment involving more than 600 US military and civilian personnel. Despite numerous and systematic abuses, not a single CIA official has been held accountable, and few military personnel have been punished. “The world is waiting to see if the special prosecutor investigates what is now overwhelming evidence of abuse,” Mariner said. “The United States cannot allow systematic torture to go unpunished.”

Death of Malnourished Girl, Marchella Pierce, Ruled Homicide

November 13, 2010 Child Abuse, Human Rights No Comments

A 4-year-old Brooklyn girl who weighed 18 pounds when she was found dead last month had toxic levels of antihistamines in her system, the city’s chief medical examiner’s office said on Friday in ruling the death a homicide.

The office said the girl, Marchella Pierce, died of “child abuse syndrome with acute drug poisoning, blunt impact injuries, malnutrition and dehydration,” according to a statement issued by the office.

The drugs found in her body were diphenhydramine and desloratadine, said Ellen Borakove, a spokeswoman for the medical examiner’s office. Each drug is marketed under many names, including Benadryl for diphenhydramine and Clarinex for desloratadine. The term child abuse syndrome means that the abuse occurred over a period of time and was not a one-time occurrence, Ms. Borakove said.

Investigators have been awaiting the findings since the police found the girl dead in her mother’s apartment on Sept. 2. The mother, Carlotta Brett-Pierce, is facing charges that include second-degree assault, endangering the welfare of a child, unlawful imprisonment and reckless endangerment. Those charges are likely to be elevated sharply based on the medical examiner’s findings.

“The case is under investigation and additional charges are possible,” said Jonah Bruno, a spokesman for the Brooklyn district attorney’s office.

In a criminal complaint filed last month, prosecutors outlined a litany of abuse that they said the girl suffered in her final days at the hands of her mother. The girl, who had been plagued by severe health problems since her birth on April 30, 2006, and spent most of her life hospitalized, had only returned to the family full time in February.

Ms. Brett-Pierce repeatedly struck the girl with a belt and a video box at their home on Madison Street in Bedford-Stuyvesant, the complaint said, citing a witness account. The mother lashed the girl to a bed with twine and forced her “to take blue sleeping pills,” the complaint added.

A Brooklyn grand jury is also looking into actions of the Administration for Children’s Services, which had monitored the girl’s family before she died, and other agencies that were involved in the girl’s care.

In testimony to the City Council this month, the children’s services commissioner, John B. Mattingly, acknowledged that the case revealed systemic problems in the agency that persisted even after reforms were instituted following the 2006 beating death of a 7-year-old girl, Nixzmary Brown.

In Marchella’s case, a caseworker and a supervisor in the Brooklyn field office of the children’s services agency appeared not to have visited the girl or her family for months, the agency acknowledged, despite indications that she was at risk. The last recorded contact, the agency said, was on March 2.

In a statement released on Friday, the agency said, “Since learning of her death and launching an investigation we have already begun addressing practice concerns within the child welfare system that were identified as a result of this case.”

Female Domestic Workers Must Be Protected in Indonesia

November 13, 2010 Human Rights No Comments

By Carole Marzolf, Indonesia Country Specialist for Amnesty International

This week President Obama paid his first ever visit to Indonesia since he took office in 2008. It took place in a heavy climate as President Yudhoyono is dealing with two simultaneous natural disasters: an earthquake followed by a deadly tsunami and a series of volcano eruptions which have triggered international media attention. Yet, while these catastrophes may provide the media with ‘outstanding’ visuals, a silent human tragedy unfurling the whole archipelago goes unreported.

Every year in Indonesia, an estimated 20,000 women die during pregnancy and childbirth. Amnesty International published last week a report on maternal health in Indonesia. This report shows that discriminatory laws, gender stereotyping and criminalization of abortion constitute violations of women’s rights and of the state’s duty to guarantee the right to the highest attainable standard of health, including reproductive health, free from discrimination, coercion and the threat of criminalization.

But the report also pointed out that some groups such as domestic workers are more vulnerable than others to violations of their sexual and reproductive rights. An estimated 2.6 million people work as domestic workers in Indonesia, the vast majority of whom are women and girls. Girls under 18 years old are believed to make up a third of that figure. Yet, the 2003 Manpower Act fails to provide any form of protection to Indonesian domestic workers who have been left out of the piece of legislation.

This act contains a number of provisions specifically protecting women during menstrual period, pregnancy and night work. But the Manpower Act only applies to employees of “entrepreneurs” in “business” or “social and other undertakings with officials in charge’ – definition which private households and domestic workers do not meet.

Because domestic workers’ work takes place in the employer’s home and they are often isolated from their families, they can face abuses and difficulty accessing sexual information and education, family planning, and health care services.  Lenny, a 14-year old domestic worker from Java was abducted, drugged, and smuggled to another province of Indonesia, where she worked 19 hours a day with no compensation whatsoever while being abused both physically and psychologically until she escaped three months later.

Amnesty International has been vocal advocating for female domestic workers rights in Indonesia. In 2007, we published the report Indonesia – Exploitation and Abuse: the Plight of Women Domestic Workers. In 2010, several public statements were issued, urging Parliamentary Commission IX to move forward with a Bill on domestic workers which would meet international laws and standards. Now is the time to prioritize the passing of legislation on domestic workers with explicit provisions pertaining to maternity.  Join us in urging the Indonesian Parliament to care about women and girls domestic workers in Indonesia by passing a domestic workers bill.

Human Rights Now – Amnesty International USA Blog

The Child Soldier on Trial at Guantanamo

November 13, 2010 Child Abuse, Human Rights No Comments

Source: HRW

As I sat watching the sentencing hearing at Guantanamo Bay of Omar Khadr, a former child soldier, I wondered how his being detained here for eight years without trial could actually be used against him. But that was the thrust of the testimony on Tuesday before the military commission of the prosecution’s expert witness on Khadr’s future dangerousness. There Khadr sat, silently, hair and beard trimmed, in a dark suit, while over and over again, Dr. Michael Welner, a board certified forensic psychiatrist and creator of the “depravity scale,” talked about how Khadr had been “marinating” in the radical jihadi views of elder statesmen of terrorist groups while at Guantanamo.

Khadr, only 15 at the time of his apprehension but 24 now, has pleaded guilty in a military commission to five charges, including murder in violation of the laws of war for the killing of US Army Sgt. First Class Christopher Speer. Speer was fatally wounded on July 27, 2002, after U.S. forces entered a compound in Afghanistan where Khadr and others were located. After a firefight ensued, prosecutors alleged Khadr threw a grenade that killed Speer and wounded others.

Khadr was also seriously wounded in the firefight, half-blinded in one eye and with two bullet wounds to his chest. In bringing the murder in violation of the laws of war charge before a military commission, the U.S. government is saying that the killing of a combatant openly on the battlefield is a war crime when committed by an irregular combatant. It’s a novel legal argument: Merely engaging in battle as an insurgent rather than as a member of a regular army has never made such battlefield conduct a war crime. And Khadr’s plea deal makes the U.S. the first Western nation since World War II to convict someone for acts committed as a child in a war crimes tribunal.

But none of this was heard by the military jury on Tuesday. Nor is there reason to believe it will be taken into account when the jury decides sentencing. While the public knows that Khadr, a Canadian national, has entered into a plea agreement, the military jury charged with sentencing has not been informed of the deal-eight years, one in Guantanamo followed by another seven in Canada. Instead, following courts-martial practice, they only know that Khadr has pleaded guilty and will issue a sentence after hearing testimony from both prosecution and defense witnesses. If by chance they issue a shorter sentence, Khadr gets the benefit. But if they issue a longer one, the terms of the plea agreement will govern.

It is hard to imagine the jury will issue a shorter sentence after seeing the direction the prosecution’s case is taking. Dr. Welner appears to be their star witness, although he might be eclipsed by the widow of Sgt. Speer. Ms. Speer wept openly in court while the prosecution read a statement about how the grenade thrown during the firefight caused Speer mortal brain damage. She will testify later this week, as will former Army Special Forces Sgt. Layne Morris, who was blinded in one eye during the same firefight.

But on Tuesday, the focus of the testimony was on Khadr’s remorse, or lack thereof. Two former interrogators testified that Khadr had bragged about killing a U.S. soldier and that he claimed the day he planted land mines to kill U.S. and coalition forces was the happiest day of his life. But neither had seen him since they last interrogated him in 2002, when he was 16 years old and still medicated from surgery for his near fatal injuries.

Former interrogators and Dr. Welner testified that when Khadr was angry at his guards, he would recall how he had killed a U.S. soldier and that would make him happy. The implication, of course, was that Khadr was, in the words of one interrogator, “cold and callous.”

Unstated was why Khadr might be so angry at US soldiers as to relish in the death of one of them. The jury will never hear testimony about how Khadr was strung up like a big over the air vent to his cell in Bagram, or that interrogators told him a fictional story of a young man sent to an American prison who was gang-raped and died of related injuries-implying that Khadr might face a similar fate if he failed to cooperate.

They will never see the video of his interrogation by Canadian intelligence agents where he is lying on the floor crying for his mother. Nor will the prosecution present evidence of international law that required Khadr to be treated differently upon capture from other detainees because of his age.

Dr. Welner stated his conclusion at the outset: Omar Khadr is “highly dangerous.” But the basis for his conclusion was far scarier than any threat of recidivism. He relied on Khadr’s devoutness, the fact that while in Guantanamo he memorized the Koran (a respected feat in Islam) and has led prayer in his cell block. These factors apparently suggest that Khadr is a radical jihadi.

He acknowledged that Khadr has never been violent at Guantanamo and that the camp where he is housed is reserved for the most “compliant” detainees. But at the same time he insinuated that Khadr’s fluency in several languages and ability to communicate with many different people was somehow negative. He seemed dismayed Khadr had not become more “Westernized” and fraternized more with his guards.

Further supposedly damning evidence was Khadr’s charm. This, Dr. Welner suggested, would surely make Khadr an influential al Qaeda leader. The No. 1 reason that Khadr was dangerous: his father. A senior ranking al Qaeda leader now dead, Khadr’s father took him to visit al Qaeda leaders when he was 10 and to a military training camp when he was 15. The fact that this constituted use and abuse by Khadr’s father did not seem to be important. Dr. Welner apparently spent 500 to 600 hours working on Khadr’s case for that conclusion, at a cost of several hundred thousand dollars to U.S. taxpayers.

The plea bargain indeed is a hand well played by the prosecution. It has cleansed this case of all its untidy aspects: the abuse allegations, the flouting of international law with respect to the treatment of juveniles, the invention of new war crimes and of an entirely new, untested, and deeply flawed legal process. None will be mentioned in the courtroom. Nor will the pathetic record of Guantanamo in general. Khadr’s case is only the fifth to be prosecuted since Guantanamo opened its doors over eight years ago. This, despite the fact that more than 800 prisoners have passed through Guantanamo’s gates, the vast majority of them entirely innocent. Of the 174 who remain, roughly half are due to be released. These statistics stand in sharp contrast to that of the tried, true, and more efficient U.S. federal courts, where more than 400 terrorism cases have been prosecuted since 9/11.

Instead, the prosecution parades a theory of dangerousness that has pervaded U.S. detention policy for years: The men in Guantanamo are dangerous, and they are dangerous because they are in Guantanamo.

NGO Letter to President Obama regarding waivers to the Child Soldiers Prevention Act

November 12, 2010 Child Abuse, Human Rights No Comments

Dear President Obama,

We are writing to express our deep disappointment with your decision to grant blanket national interest waivers and allow all forms of US military assistance to Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Sudan, and Yemen, despite their continued use of child soldiers in violation of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 (Title IV of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act).

We recognize that the United States has a complex set of national interests in each of these countries, including for example, counter-terrorism concerns in Yemen. However, the administration could have accommodated these concerns while also showing that it was taking the Child Soldiers Prevention Act seriously and using its leverage strategically to effectively end the use of child soldiers.

As you know, the Child Soldiers Prevention Act was adopted in 2008 with strong bipartisan support from Congress because of deep concerns over the continuing recruitment and use of child soldiers around the world. By prohibiting foreign military financing, military training and several other categories of US military assistance to governments using child soldiers, the law allows the US administration to exert powerful leverage on states with abusive child recruitment policies and practices. The United States was one of the first countries in the world to enact such groundbreaking legislation.

As mandated by the Act, the State Department identified countries in violation of the law in its annual Trafficking in Persons report, which was published on June 14, 2010. The countries identified were Burma, Chad, DRC, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Of the six, Burma receives no US military assistance and the administration contends that the assistance received by Somalia is not covered by the law.

Your decision to give the remaining four countries a blanket waiver means that none of the six violators will be impacted by the law. We believe that your waiver undermines the intent of the law and sends an unfortunate message that the administration is not seriously committed to ending the use of child soldiers. By giving a blanket waiver, the administration has also given up the significant leverage that the law provides to influence the child recruitment practices of its military allies.

The White House has stated that continued engagement will allow the United States to help these governments end their use of child soldiers, including by professionalizing their military forces and implementing existing plans to end child recruitment. However, this approach has been ineffective thus far. The DRC has received IMET training from the US since FY 2004, and Chad has received IMET since at least FY 2002. Yet both countries continue to use child soldiers in their forces. Continuing existing programs-as the US has done for years-without other changes in the approach is unlikely to yield change. Informing these governments that certain programs will be suspended until they have removed all child soldiers from their ranks could prove more effective.

The Child Soldiers Prevention Act does not present an “all or nothing” approach. Section 404 (e) of the Act permits continued engagement with governments in violation of the Act. Specifically, the section allows assistance for “international military education, training, and nonlethal supplies” otherwise prohibited under the Act upon certification to the appropriate congressional committees that the government is taking reasonable steps to demobilize child soldiers, provide rehabilitation and reintegration assistance, and that US assistance is directly supporting the professionalization of the military.

Many of the military programs identified in the memorandum of justification regarding the waiver of restrictions could have been continued under Section 404 (e). In contrast to the use of the blanket waiver, providing programs through Section 404 (e) would have tied the continued assistance directly to concrete progress in ending child soldier use.

Your decision to issue the waivers was unfortunate. However, we don’t believe that you need to wait until next year’s determination process to take additional action on this issue. We recommend the following:

1) Establish specific benchmarks with the governments concerned within the next six months. These benchmarks should require a cessation of new child recruitment and demonstrable progress in the demobilization or release of children from existing forces. Failure to do so should result in the suspension of specific and targeted military programs;

2) Publically commit to refrain from transferring any lethal equipment to Chad, DRC, and Sudan until the Secretary of State certifies that these countries are no longer in violation of the Child Soldier Prevention Act;

3) Establish a substantive dialogue with key stakeholders, particularly the NGOs and Congressional offices involved in creating the Child Soldiers Prevention Act, regarding:

a) the determination of governments to be listed in 2011;

b) how determinations regarding any waivers and/or exceptions under section 404(e) will be made;

c) how the law can be most effectively implemented in order to achieve its objectives.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely yours,

African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies

African Faith & Justice Network

American Federation of Teachers

Amnesty International USA

Baptist Peace Fellowship of North America

Caring for Kaela

Child Protection International

Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers

3D Security Initiative

Fellowship of Reconciliation

Foreign Policy in Focus

Friends Committee on National Legislation

Human Rights First

Human Rights Program, University of Minnesota

Human Rights Watch

International Labor Rights Forum

International Justice Mission

Multifaith Voices for Peace and Justice

National Consumers League

Open Society Policy Center

Oxfam America

Pax Christi USA

Physicians for Human Rights

Presbyterian Church USA

Ramsay Merriam Fund

Refugees International

Resolve

United Methodist Church, General Board of Church & Society

World Vision

CC:

The Honorable Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State

Samantha Power, Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights at the National Security Council

The Honorable Maria Otero, Undersecretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs

The Honorable Michael Posner, Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

The Honorable Andrew J. Shapiro, Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs

The Honorable Harold Koh, Legal Advisor, Department of State

Ambassador Luis CdeBaca, Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

Senator Richard Durbin

Senator Sam Brownback

Senator John Kerry, Chair, Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Senator Richard Lugar, ranking member, Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Congressman Howard Berman, Chair, House Committee on Foreign Affairs

Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, ranking member, House Committee on Foreign Affairs

 

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Elyssa: I TOTALLY agree that they are all lies!!! Wow.. High Impact ...
  • AMY DELUcA: I was sent to casa by the sea march 9th 2003 I got a story t...
  • Betsy Rendahl Corey: POW s of Nancy Reagan's War on Drugs. Has she said anything...
  • Betsy Rendahl Corey: I was in St Pete Straight Inc. 1981, I was 15 years old. I l...
  • EB: Actually I'll have you know Elan is clising! :)...

Sponsored By

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

Calendar

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Human Rights

Brainwashing Is Real and It’s Really Not Therapy

September 14, 2011

Dear People, I would like encourage America to make brainwashing illegal. Would you please forward this email to fellow survivors, their families, psychologists, politicians, the media, anyone at all interested…. Brainwashing Is Real and It’s Really Not Therapy I was a 16 year old pot head. I needed help and my parents decided I should [...]

I Went to the ELAN School by Cristine Martino Slingerland

May 8, 2011

Thank you Morgan Mitchell for courageously telling your story. I totally agree with you that Elan is not the place to send your children. My parents were clueless and to this day, not that I bring it up anymore, they shut down anytime I bring up what happened to me there. My mother one time [...]

Straight Inc., Legacy of Torture as Treatment

April 26, 2011

Taken from Reddit Straight Inc., Legacy of Torture as Treatment I have ten friends who have committed suicide, we were all clients of Straight Inc. I consider myself a survivor. Between 1976 and 1993, as many as 50,000 kids in nine states were clients of this drug-rehabilitation center for teens. To progress through the program [...]

The Silence: On air and online April 19, 2011 at 9:00pm

April 19, 2011

FRONTLINE examines a little-known chapter of the Catholic Church sex abuse story — decades of abuse of Native Americans by priests and other church workers in Alaska. Through candid interviews with survivors, this FRONTLINE report focuses on the abuse by a number of men who worked for the Church along Alaska’s far west coast in [...]

Clips from Surviving Straight Inc.

April 14, 2011

Clips from the upcoming documentary Surviving Straight Inc.