Human rights group calls for tribal arrest power

February 8, 2010 Human Rights No Comments

BOISE, Idaho (AP) – A northern Idaho human rights group says a county sheriff is refusing to cooperate with the Coeur d’Alene Indian Tribe on law enforcement, leading to a growing number of criminals being released without prosecution.

The Kootenai County Task Force on Human Relations on Thursday called for the Idaho Legislature to pass a bill that will let Idaho tribal police officers arrest non-tribal members who violate state law on the reservation.

The proposal, due to be introduced next week at the Capitol, would require those arrested by tribal police to be tried in state court. Tribal officers would have to be certified by the state police academy near Boise, as Coeur d’Alene tribal officers are now. Other tribes, including Shoshone-Bannock and Shoshone-Paiute tribes in southern Idaho, wouldn’t be forced to participate.

Christie Wood, a task force leader, wrote in an open letter to Idaho lawmakers Thursday that Benewah County Sheriff Bob Kirts refuses to respond to tribal calls for help with reservation crimes and won’t reinstate a cross-deputization agreement with tribal police. Without such a pact, Coeur d’Alene tribal police can’t currently arrest non-tribal members on Indian territory.

“The failure of Sheriff Kirts to work with the Tribal Police has left citizens in bedlam,” Wood wrote, according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Associated Press. “Perpetrators have been set free that have committed serious criminal offenses against citizens living in Benewah County.”

The tribe contends the county’s conduct results in at least 90 non-Indians every month who are suspected of crimes from domestic violence and drunken driving to serious criminal assaults being freed without prosecution.

Kirts said the tribe’s account – and the letter to lawmakers – are inaccurate and misleading.

“I think somebody is feeding them a line of fecal matter,” he told the AP, adding the tribe is trying to pressure his agency. “They came to me and said, ‘If you deputize us, we will not put the law through the Legislature. To me, that’s a threat. I said, ‘Let’s go.”’

The Coeur d’Alene reservation’s checkerboard property ownership – its 10,000 residents include about 8,600 nonmembers – means tribal officers often encounter crimes committed by nonmembers in both Kootenai and Benewah counties. The tribe has a cross-deputization agreement with Kootenai County that allows its 13 full-time officers and five reservists to arrest non-tribal members on the reservation there.

“This agreement has worked remarkably well to protect citizens from criminal activity,” the task force wrote.

A similar pact with Benewah County collapsed in January 2007, in part due to a dispute over tribal authorities’ power to handle some minor offenses.

The two sides have different versions of what happened.

“They started to cite non-tribal members in tribal court, saying ‘If you take care of this here, there will be no record on your license,”’ Kirts told the AP.

Helo Hancock, the tribe’s attorney and legislative director, conceded there were fundamental disagreements between Benewah County and the tribe over its authority to cite a non-tribal member for a civil infraction. But he maintained that’s within the tribe’s purview, but said tribal officials have offered Kirts an olive branch: They would discontinue the practice if he would uphold the cross-deputization pact.

Kirts has rebuffed offers to reinstate the agreement, Hancock said, leaving the tribe no other choice but to go to the Idaho Legislature for help.

“We have a growing problem that requires a reasonable solution,” he said. “When Benewah County deputies are unable or unwilling to respond, it means we have to turn perpetrators loose, simply because we don’t have the authority to make an arrest.”

Source: http://nativetimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3029:human-rights-group-calls-for-tribal-arrest-power&catid=55&Itemid=31

U.S., EU ‘Condemn’ Iranian Human Rights Violations

February 8, 2010 Human Rights No Comments

The United States and the European Union on Monday offered a condemnation against Iran’s government for human rights violations, saying intimidation, detentions, show trials and executions of presidential election protesters defies international standards.

“We call on the government of Iran to live up to its international human rights obligations, to end its abuses against its own people, to hold accountable those who have committed the abuses and to release those who are exercising their rights,” reads a joint statement issued by the White House.

The 31st anniversary of the Islamic revolution is Thursday, and EU and U.S. officials say they are concerned that the date will be used by the Iranian government to crack down further on individuals who’ve protested Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s election last June 12. Many say Ahmadinejad stole the vote out from opposition leader Mir Hossein Moussavi

Amnesty International cites Iranian counts that 40 people have died in demonstrations since the election, and more than 5,000 people have been arrested while scores have been sentenced to prison and at least 11 sentenced to death, including two, Mohammad Reza Ali-Zamani and Arash Rahmanipour, whose executions were carried out on Jan. 28 after being convicted in October of “enmity to God.”

“The United States and the European Union condemn the continuing human rights violations,” the joint U.S.-EU statement said. “The large scale detentions and mass trials, the threatened execution of protestors, the intimidation of family members of those detained and the continuing denial to its citizens of the right to peaceful expression are contrary to human rights norms.”

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/08/eu-condemn-iranian-human-rights-violations/

The Human-Rights Facade Is Beginning to Crumble

February 8, 2010 Human Rights No Comments

Noah Pollak – 02.08.2010 – 8:26 AM

The collaboration between Amnesty International and an unrepentant Islamist named Moazzam Begg has been a source of wonderment among those who follow these kinds of things, but only back-burner wonderment, obscured by the media’s general tendency to protect the credibility of “human rights” NGOs, or at least not ask too many questions.

The UK Times was impelled, finally, to give some space to the fact that Amnesty, one of the two largest human-rights groups* (the other being Human Rights Watch) has been promoting Begg, a former Gitmo detainee and booster of terrorists and radicals. What finally attracted press attention to this outrageous state of affairs was the appearance of a whistleblower from within the ranks of Amnesty.

Meet Gita Sahgal, the head of Amnesty’s gender unit. She went public with her disgust after spending two years in a failed effort to separate Amnesty from Begg:

“I believe the campaign [with Begg's organization, "Cageprisoners"] fundamentally damages Amnesty International’s integrity and, more importantly, constitutes a threat to human rights,” Sahgal wrote in an email to the organisation’s leaders on January 30. “To be appearing on platforms with Britain’s most famous supporter of the Taliban, whom we treat as a human rights defender, is a gross error of judgment.”

No kidding. But this story doesn’t have a happy ending. Amnesty responded to her going public by suspending her. The excellent British blog Harry’s Place has posted her statement:

A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when a great organisation must ask: if it lies to itself, can it demand the truth of others? For in defending the torture standard, one of the strongest and most embedded in international human rights law, Amnesty International has sanitized the history and politics of the ex-Guantanamo detainee, Moazzam Begg and completely failed to recognize the nature of his organisation Cageprisoners. …

The issue is a fundamental one about the importance of the human rights movement maintaining an objective distance from groups and ideas that are committed to systematic discrimination and fundamentally undermine the universality of human rights.

Or, as a British blogger puts it, “upholding concepts of due process and women’s rights may not be best served by strolling along to Downing Street hand in hand with Moazzam Begg, a Salafi Islamist who has attended Jihadi training camps in Afghanistan and Bosnia.”

There is a vital role for groups like HRW and Amnesty to play in the world. Properly understood, their mission is to use their moral authority to shame and condemn tyranny and those who wish to make the world a hospitable place for tyrants and terrorists. But moral authority requires moral clarity. HRW and Amnesty have been overtaken by activists who use their position to wage easy campaigns against open societies instead of taking on the more difficult, thankless, and sometimes dangerous struggle against closed ones.

For people who do not follow these issues closely, there have been a few recent moments that indicate beyond any doubt that something is rotten in the “human-rights community.” One moment was when HRW went to Saudi Arabia to raise money. We have arrived at another such moment: a human-rights organization has suspended an employee for complaining about the organization’s partnership with a terrorist.

*In my opinion, the largest and most important human rights organization in the world is the U.S. Army, but that’s an argument for another time.

Source: http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/pollak/233011

Japan breached human rights of Greenpeace protesters, says UN

February 8, 2010 Human Rights No Comments

A United Nations committee has ruled that the Japanese Government repeatedly breached human rights guarantees in pursuit of two Greenpeace whistleblowers who exposed an illegal trade in whale meat. The finding is seen as an embarrassment for Japan before the trial of the ”Tokyo Two” activists next Monday.

The UN Human Rights Committee’s Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found the rights of the activists not to be arbitrarily deprived of liberty, and to engage in protest, were not respected by the Japanese justice system.

Junichi Sato, 32, and Toru Suzuki, 42, were jailed for 26 days without charge after being arrested in 2008.

Greenpeace had been investigating claims that the crew of the whaling factory ship Nisshin Maru had taken hundreds of kilograms of meat as part of a blackmarket.

The two took a box of the meat, which Greenpeace presented at a press conference in Tokyo, before taking it to the city’s public prosecutor, seeking action. Instead the pair were arrested for theft.

Amnesty International filed a complaint to the UN committee last year. In its investigation released to the Herald yesterday, the committee concluded the detention of the two was arbitrary, and contravened three articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and two articles of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Andrew Darby

Source: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/whale-watch/japan-breached-human-rights-of-greenpeace-protesters-says-un-20100208-nn9y.html

Human Rights World Report 2010: Iran Targets Human Rights Messengers

February 8, 2010 Human Rights No Comments

The 612-page report, HRW’s 20th annual review of human rights practices around the globe, summarizes major human rights trends in more than 90 nations.

Human Rights Watch cited Sudan and China as countries that routinely shut down human rights groups and Iran and Uzbekistan as countries that openly harass and arbitrarily detain human rights workers and other critics.

In Iran, Human Rights Watch covered the continuing governmental crackdown on peaceful activists following the disputed presidential election of June 2009. Human Rights Watch documented the arrests of thousands of ordinary and high-profile people, providing detailed accounts of state violence against peaceful protesters, arbitrary detention of human rights defenders, and abuse and torture in Iran’s illegal detention centers.

Disbarring Lawyers
In June 2009, following the disputed presidential elections, the Iranian government adopted new regulations that severely limit the independence of the Iranian Bar Association, giving the government control over a lawyer’s right to practice. Until then, the Bar Association, which has the exclusive power to grant or deny licenses to practice, had resisted government efforts to rein in lawyers who defend human rights.

Criminal Charges
The Iranian government has arrested scores of NGO activists and sentenced them to prison on the grounds that their work or speech allegedly “harms national security” or that they are “foreign agents.” Members of Kurdish rights organizations have faced even worse, with lengthy prison sentences, including the death penalty, for their work reporting on rights violations affecting the Kurdish community. In 2008, the government sentenced to death Farzad Kamangar, a member of the Organization for the Defense of Human Rights in Kurdistan, claiming without proof that he was a member of the banned Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). It also sentenced Sadigh Kaboudvand, who headed the group, to 11 years in prison for his NGO activities, along with prison terms for 12 of his colleagues.

Torture and Ill-Treatment of Political Prisoners
Following the disputed election, both ordinary protestors and prominent opposition figures faced detention without trial, harsh treatment including sexual violence and denial of due process including lack of access to lawyers of their choosing.

Freedom of Expression
Iranian authorities continued to imprison journalists and editors for publishing critical views, and strictly controlled publishing and academic activities.

Freedom of Association
The government increased restrictions on civil society organizations that advocate human rights and freedom of speech. Security forces on December 23, 2008 shut down the Center for Defenders of Human Rights, led by 2003 Noble Peace Prize Laureate Shirin Ebadi.

Death Penalty
Iran carries out more executions annually than any other nation except China. These executions frequently occur after unfair or political crimes with inadequate access to legal counsel.

Human Rights Defenders
The government escalated its crackdown on human rights lawyers in 2009, subjecting some to arbitrary detention, travel bans, and harassment.

Treatment of Minorities
The government continues to deny members of the Baha’i faith, Iran’s largest
non-Muslim religious minority, freedom of religion.

See complete report on Iran and a few selected countries by clicking on the following  images.

Source: http://www.astreetjournalist.com/2010/02/08/human-rights-world-report-2010-iran-targets-human-rights-messengers/

Human Rights

Supreme Court Finds Life Without Parole Unconstitutional for Some Juvenile Criminals

May 17, 2010

Justices Rule 5 to 4, Ban Life Without Parole for Juvenile Offenders Who Didn’t Kill
By DEVIN DWYER and ARIANE de VOGUE
The Supreme Court ruled today that the 8th Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment means juvenile offenders who haven’t been convicted of murder shouldn’t be sentenced to life in prison without any chance of [...]

Placebo effect beats God, Prozac

May 7, 2010

By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
This is the story of three drugs. Except one is not really a drug at all and is merely an illusion, a nifty construct, an intense belief that it might be a drug, even though, as mentioned, it is very much not. We just think it is. [...]

Torture Against Children and Adults with Disabilities in the United States

April 29, 2010

MDRI Alleges Torture Against Children and Adults with Disabilities in the United States
Files Urgent Appeal to United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture in Geneva
Washington, DC – April 29, 2010 – Mental Disability Rights International (MDRI) has found children and adults with disabilities tortured and abused at a “special needs” residential facility in Massachusetts and has [...]

Rebecca Riley’s doctor on the defense

April 26, 2010

During the past 20 years, the number of people on government disability due to “mental illness” has soared, rising from around 1.25 million people in 1987 to more than four million today. The number of children on the SSI rolls due to severe mental illness has increased more than 35-fold since 1987. Those numbers tell of an “epidemic,” and the book then asks this heretical question: Could our drug-based paradigm of care be fueling that epidemic?

Why Are We Drugging Our Kids?

April 26, 2010

By Evelyn Pringle, TruthOut.org. Posted December 14, 2009.
Psychiatric drugs are overprescribed and can even make mental symptoms worse in kids. They’re also a goldmine for drug companies.
Prescriptions for psychiatric drugs increased 50 percent with children in the US, and 73 percent among adults, from 1996 to 2006, according to a study in the May/June 2009 [...]

Calendar

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Felice: Here is a video I made: Wisconsin Eugenics Program http://...
  • Paul Isley: Maybe you need to put your purse down......
  • DavidAvamtriatialt: Three guys were having a beer in a bar in London. They were ...
  • Ex BGStudent: Brighton Grammar has a lot to answer for as sexual assault a...
  • Kelley Starnes: I was in Straight Inc. in Marietta, Ga from 1987 - 1988. Mr...

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Sponsored By

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement