Cannabis Column: The Top Ten Obstacles to Marijuana Law Reform

Jon Gettman is a long time contributor to HIGH TIMES. A former National Director of NORML, Jon has a Ph.D. in public policy and regional economic development and consults with attorneys, advocates, and non-profits on cannabis related research and public policy issues. On October 8, 2002, along with a coalition of organizations, he filed a new petition to have cannabis rescheduled under federal law. This column will track that petition’s progress.

 

The Top Ten Obstacles to Marijuana Law Reform   

 

A lot of people think that the pharmaceutical industry is one of the most powerful opponents to marijuana’s legalization. They don’t realize that these companies stand to make billions of dollars off of the chemical compounds contained in marijuana in a legal regulatory climate. The reality is that the current restrictions on marijuana make scientific research on marijuana-related pharmaceuticals too expensive to pursue, and the restrictive regulatory climate concerning anything related to marijuana creates too much uncertainty about future sales and profits to justify developing marijuana related drugs. Even if marijuana were legal and widely available, there would still be a valuable market for a marijuana-based painkiller that was 50 to 100 times more powerful than the herb itself.

 

Many others think the alcohol industry is another potential opponent to marijuana’s legalization. However, they realize that the popularity of alcohol has withstood the test of time, not to mention marijuana’s immense popularity over the last several decades. Legal marijuana is not a threat to their profits, and if it were, they would just enter the business themselves.

 

But if not the pharmaceutical and alcohol industries, what are the greatest obstacles to marijuana’s legalization? Here’s a list of the top ten obstacles. They can all be overcome, but they all represent formidable opponents to marijuana reform.

 

#10 – Conservative opposition to the Obama Administration. A cautionary note – there are many conservatives in favor of legalizing marijuana, and not just dedicated libertarians. For example, Rich Lowry, editor of the National Review, wrote a superb article in favor of marijuana reform in 2001. But there aren’t many conservatives who support the Obama Administration. For example, also turn to the National Review, particularly their popular blog, The Corner, for a good sampling of conservative criticism of the President, his agenda and his policies.

 

Conservatives are looking for issues to both rally their base and reassemble their successful coalitions of years past. Tough anti-drug policies were a staple of the Reagan era, and a return to the policies of this period are advocated by some conservatives as the key to a conservative comeback in American electoral politics. Regardless of the conservative agenda, many Democrats will resist marijuana’s legalization out of concern that it will provide conservatives an easy target to exploit. On the other hand, support for legalization could be a part of a successful strategy by conservatives to appeal to younger voters. There is an ongoing debate in conservative circles about how to rally support to their cause and oppose Obama’s policies. The complexities of this debate, and its effect on their liberal opponents, represent a potential obstacle to marijuana’s legalization.

 

#9 – Anti-drug crusaders. Drug abuse is a serious issue, and efforts to prevent, reduce, and treat drug abuse attract many serious, sincere, and dedicated individuals whose valuable work is worthy of respect and support. Many people in the prevention profession have mixed feelings about marijuana; while in favor of discouraging its use, especially by teenagers, they also recognize that our current laws often have counter-productive effects, such as making marijuana readily available to all age groups. Nonetheless, there are many individuals and organizations in the anti-drug abuse movement who believe that opposing marijuana’s legalization is integral to their efforts. The Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America (CADCA) is a prominent example. Arguments against marijuana’s legalization are a prominent part of their public policy materials, and, for example, they argue that “Medical marijuana [is] being used as wedge issue to legalize drugs by a few wealthy individuals who have otherwise been unable to advance their personal political agendas.”

 

#8 – Drug War funding benefactors. The federal Office of National Drug Control Policy recently published a summary of the FY 2010 budget for the programs that implement federal drug policy. The entire budget request is for $15.1 billion, an increase of 1.5% over the budget for FY2009. The budget includes $238.6 million for the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities (SDFSC) National Programs, $90 million for Drug-Free Communities programs and $70 million for the ongoing national Media Campaign. The budget delivers $3.4 billion in funds for domestic law enforcement, which includes many avenues for providing assistance to local law enforcement, such as the ONDCP’s program for providing $220 million for law enforcement activities in High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas. These funds are used for all anti-drug programs, not just those focused on marijuana. These funding streams, though, create constituencies that provide political support to preserve and maintain this flow of federal money. CADCA, for example, encouraged its members and supporters to support funding for the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities program. Many of those individuals and groups that receive federal anti-drug funding oppose marijuana’s legalization. In addition to their policy positions, they believe their work is important and deserves continued financial support from the federal government. 

 

#7 – State prosecutors. In 2007 there were 97,582 arrests in the United States for marijuana sales, 5.3% of all drug abuse arrests. The sale of marijuana is a felony under state law. Career prosecutors gain professional advancement by accumulating felony convictions. There is nothing sinister about this; it’s their job to convict people arrested by police for felony crimes. From their perspective, anyone arrested with more than a few ounces of marijuana possesses more marijuana than should be allowed for personal possession and should be prosecuted for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute it. Under many circumstances these defendants represent potentially easy convictions for career prosecutors. Prosecutors have a limited view of marijuana use; they come into contact with people charged with serious crimes and they associate marijuana use with criminal behavior – they have little contact with most marijuana users, most of whom do not commit crimes (other than possessing marijuana.)

 

#6 – The Urine Testing Industry. Do a Google search with the term ‘Urine Testing for Drug Abuse,’ and you’ll get close to 1 million hits. That’s a pretty reliable indicator that there is a lot of information in circulation about urine tests for drugs, whether it concerns companies selling tests, policies about testing at work or in the criminal justice system, or targeted at people just trying to beat the tests. Take a look at the ads on the right hand side of the page. Urine testing for drugs is big business, and marijuana is the most commonly use illegal drug. In 1991 the drug testing industry had estimated revenues of $340 million. Now it brings in nearly $2 billion annually. The Drug and Alcohol Testing Industry Association (DATIA) has over 1,300 members, represents more than 1 million companies in the industry, and their members perform more than 60 million drug and alcohol tests per year. Legalization will significantly reduce the revenue for this industry by reducing the justification for marijuana-related urine testing.

 

#5 – Foreign drug cartels. In late December 2008, Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard indicated he would be willing to consider the legalization of marijuana as a way of defunding foreign drug cartels. Goddard spoke at a press conference announcing the breakup of a Mexican drug ring responsible for bringing 400,000 lbs of marijuana into Arizona every year since 2003. According to Goddard, marijuana, was responsible for 75% of the money Mexican cartels use for other operations. While currently opposed to marijuana’s legalization, Goddard believes that all options should be on the table. Despite massive and growing domestic cannabis production capabilities, a large amount of the marijuana consumed in the United States is imported. Legalization will cost foreign operations considerable profits; they aren’t about to give this up without a fight.

 

#4 – Progressive political priorities. Marijuana’s legalization has never been a priority for political progressives. While many liberals and progressives are sympathetic to drug policy reform in general and supportive of marijuana’s legalization in particular, other goals have usually been more important. Issues such as ending US military involvement Iraq, reducing global warming, reforming the US health care system, equal rights for gays and lesbians, and continued opposition to conservative political priorities have been progressive political objectives over the last decade. Legalization will require political support from legislators and political leaders, and they must be encouraged to support legalization from a wide spectrum of activists and organizations. One of the greatest obstacles to marijuana’s legalization is the low priority it represents for many liberal and progressive activists.

 

#3 – Ignorance. Scientific research has refuted all of the hysterical claims about marijuana that were circulated during the 20th century, however many people don’t know this. Marijuana use does not lead to addiction to more dangerous drugs, it does not cause an amotivational syndrome that makes people lazy and unproductive, and it does not cause birth defects. Most Americans are fairly ambivalent about adult marijuana use, but for some reason they are still concerned that if marijuana were legal it would be easier for teenagers to acquire it. Data on teenage marijuana use disputes this point. Most teenagers find marijuana is fairly easy to acquire, indeed marijuana is so expensive these days that it is profitable for teens to sell it their friends, making it even easier to get. Ignorance is one of the greatest obstacles to marijuana’s legalization, but it is also one of the easiest to overcome.

 

#2 – Apathy. Over 25 million Americans use marijuana on annual basis, and there are 14.4 million monthly users. Public support for legalization is at an all time high. And yet many marijuana users are not politically active. Support for reform groups such as the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) and NORML has been stronger over the last few years than ever, however both have a long way to go before their membership numbers reach hundreds of thousands or millions of members. Many marijuana users are young and politically inexperienced; many others still believe that marijuana will never be legalized and political activity is not worth their time, money, or interest. And yet their involvement is all it will take to overcome the obstacles to legalization listed above. None of these obstacles can prevent legalization once it has earned widespread support from a majority of the American public. Increasing political activism by marijuana users, such as through the activities of MPP, NORML, and The HIGH TIMES 420 Campaign, is a sure way to achieve the legalization of marijuana.

 

#1 – Overconfidence. Almost as bad as apathy, overconfidence is the single most significant obstacle to marijuana’s legalization. While many marijuana uses think legalization will never occur, it seems that just as many are so convinced it is inevitable they don’t bother to take part in activities to bring it about. These are good times for marijuana reform, but there are no guarantees. This is not a time for over-confidence; it’s a time for action. This is not a time to sit and watch other people get the job done, it’s a good time to get involved. It is crucial for marijuana users to understand that the battle for marijuana’s legalization is now underway. Now is the time to overcome the obstacles to legalization and make history.

Source: http://hightimes.com/legal/jgettman/5586

Help my friend Heather! The Race For the Cure is September 12th, just around the corner.

Help my friend Heather! The Race For the Cure is September 12th, just around the corner.

On a personal note, the more I thought about this the more I realized what I already knew. Without these funds for research there would not be new drugs out there for people like myself that have had three reoccurrences of breast cancer. The drugs I am taking for my diagnoses 6 weeks ago were not available in 2006. That hit too close to home. This money stays in Cincinnati for those LIVING with breast cancer and those in our future that may have to fight this nasty disease. Let’s find a CURE for breast cancer—forever.

Click here to help!

The Race for the Cure®

ONE EASY STEP: CLICK SUPPORT HEATHER AND LET’S SEE HOW MUCH WE CAN BRING IN TO STOP BREAST CANCER!!!!!!!

One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in her lifetime. The Komen Greater Cincinnati Race for the Cure® raises money to fund education, screening and treatment programs for these women and thousands of others in our own community and supports the national search for a cure.

The Komen Race for the Cure® Series is the largest series of 5K run/ walks in the world. Since its origination in Dallas in 1983, the Komen Race for the Cure® Series has grown from one local race with 800 participants to an international series of 117 races with more than 1.5 million participants.

Now going through my fourth battle of cancer with a POSITIVE attitude!!!

…I thought I had fought the toughest battle of my life when I survived cancer at the age of 13. I lost my leg and then endured a year and a half of brutal therapy in 1982.

…following the birth of my second child, I was diagnosed in March 2006 with breast cancer – positive nodes were found under my arm. Mackenzie was 4 months old at the time. During a year of treatment, I cared for a newborn and her sister, Madison, who was 21 months older. Once treatment was done, I had a double mastectomy and reconstruction. After doing some research, I also decided to go through genetic testing for the breast cancer gene–I felt the need to do this for my girls. Thank goodness I do not carry the gene.

…In May 2008, just short of being two years clear of cancer, I found a lump under my arm. Cancer had also returned in my leg and the outer lining of my lung. (The day before, I had lost my job- things weren’t going my way). As of December 2008 all cancer was once again gone!!!!!! I continued treatment until April 2009.

On Friday May 29th, 2009, I found a black and blue lump about a 1/8th of an inch thick. It was the size of the palm of my hand and located about an inch under my collar bone on top of my ribs. It appeared out of nowhere. I went to the doctor Monday June 1 and had a CT of my neck and chest. The cancer was back. It was also in the lymph nodes in my neck. Yes, it can happen that quickly.

I obviously believe in being POSITIVE and in FIGHTING. Most importantly, I believe in LIVING. I believe my two girls need their Mom in their life. I also believe that in order to accomplish all these things, the need for continued research grows even stronger in order to find a CURE. I am living proof that the advancements in research and the continued funding of these advancements DO make a difference. Please help and click support Heather or join my team:).

Click here to help!

Ireland Makes Blasphemy Illegal

Irish atheists are horrified by new legislation making blasphemy illegal, and punishable by a 25,000-Euro fine. Christians of all stripes should be, too.

As part of a revision to defamation legislation, the Dail (Irish Parliament) passed legislation creating a new crime of blasphemy. Update: The bill went to the Seanad on Friday, July 10, passing by a single vote. This attack on free speech, debated for several months in Europe, has gone largely unnoticed in the American press.

The text of the legislation is provided at the end of this post.

How does this impact free speech? Just don’t be rude.

* Atheists can be prosecuted for saying that God is imaginary. That causes outrage.
* Pagans can be prosecuted for saying they left Christianity because God is violent and bloodthirsty, promotes genocide, and permits slavery.
* Christians can be prosecuted for saying that Allah is a moon god, or for drawing a picture of Mohammed, or for saying that Islam is a violent religion which breeds terrorists.
* Jews can be prosecuted for saying Jesus isn’t the Messiah.

Is it really THAT big a deal?

Ireland’s Blasphemy Bill not only criminalizes free speech, it also gives the police the authority to confiscate anything deemed “blasphemous”. They may enter and search any premises, with force if needed, upon “reasonable suspicion” that such materials are present.

* The local Freethinkers society, with its copies of Hitchens’ God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything.
* The video store, with copies of The God Who Wasn’t There.
* The history teacher, who uses The Dark Side of Christian History to teach her class.
* The library, with its collection of books deemed blasphemous.
* Even the homeowner who lets the wrong person know he has a copy of Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses could find his door broken in by the Thought Police, his bookshelves ransacked, and his books burning in the front yard!

Satirizing religion in any way, shape, or form, if it “causes outrage”, is now a prosecutable offense in Ireland. Saying anything negative about a religion, if it “causes outrage”, can now be prosecuted as a crime. Just like in Muslim countries.

Witness the return of the Dark Ages.

Update: The bill passed the Seanad on Friday, July 10, by a single vote. From the Irish Times:

Seanad deputy leader Dan Boyle (Green Party) indicated his party’s preference for a constitutional referendum in “the mid-term” on the issue of blasphemy. However, Minister for Justice Dermot Ahern said he would hazard a guess it was unlikely they would come back to this issue for some time.

The Minister rejected Mr Regan’s contention that the matter of blasphemy could be adequately dealt with by an amendment to the Incitement to Hatred Act, saying what was blasphemous did not necessarily constitute incitement to hatred.

During exchanges with Ivana Bacik, the Minister said he had never in his political career received so many e-mails expressing outrage as he had on this issue. Ms Bacik said under the proposed legislation, Fr Willie Russell from Rathkeale, Co Limerick, a critic of those in his parish who appeared to be worshipping a tree with the appearance of the Blessed Virgin Mary, could be open to a charge of blasphemy because he had stated that no one could “worship a tree”.

Let’s see if he gets charged.

The text of the legislation:

36. Publication or utterance of blasphemous matter.

(1) A person who publishes or utters blasphemous matter shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable upon conviction on indictment to a fine not exceeding €100,000. [Amended to €25,000]

(2) For the purposes of this section, a person publishes or utters blasphemous matter if (a) he or she publishes or utters matter that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that religion, and (b) he or she intends, by the publication or utterance of the matter concerned, to cause such outrage.

(3) It shall be a defence to proceedings for an offence under this section for the defendant to prove that a reasonable person would find genuine literary, artistic, political, scientific, or academic value in the matter to which the offence relates.

37. Seizure of copies of blasphemous statements.

(1) Where a person is convicted of an offence under section 36, the court may issue a warrant (a) authorising any member of the Garda Siochana to enter (if necessary by the use of reasonable force) at all reasonable times any premises (including a dwelling) at which he or she has reasonable grounds for believing that copies of the statement to which the offence related are to be found, and to search those premises and seize and remove all copies of the statement found therein, (b) directing the seizure and removal by any member of the Garda Siochana of all copies of the statement to which the offence related that are in the possession of any person, © specifying the manner in which copies so seized and removed shall be detained and stored by the Garda Siochana.

(2) A member of the Garda Siochana may (a) enter and search any premises, (b) seize, remove and detain any copy of a statement to which an offence under section 36 relates found therein or in the possession of any person, in accordance with a warrant under subsection (1).

(3) Upon final judgment being given in proceedings for an offence under section 36, anything seized and removed under subsection (2) shall be disposed of in accordance with such directions as the court may give upon an application by a member of the Garda Siochana in that behalf.

This is the sort of thing I’d expect from Christian Dominionist Loren Cunningham, wouldn’t you?

Source: http://www.palibandaily.com/2009/07/09/ireland-makes-blasphemy-illegal/

 

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Elyssa: I TOTALLY agree that they are all lies!!! Wow.. High Impact ...
  • AMY DELUcA: I was sent to casa by the sea march 9th 2003 I got a story t...
  • Betsy Rendahl Corey: POW s of Nancy Reagan's War on Drugs. Has she said anything...
  • Betsy Rendahl Corey: I was in St Pete Straight Inc. 1981, I was 15 years old. I l...
  • EB: Actually I'll have you know Elan is clising! :)...

Sponsored By

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

Calendar

July 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Human Rights

Brainwashing Is Real and It’s Really Not Therapy

September 14, 2011

Dear People, I would like encourage America to make brainwashing illegal. Would you please forward this email to fellow survivors, their families, psychologists, politicians, the media, anyone at all interested…. Brainwashing Is Real and It’s Really Not Therapy I was a 16 year old pot head. I needed help and my parents decided I should [...]

I Went to the ELAN School by Cristine Martino Slingerland

May 8, 2011

Thank you Morgan Mitchell for courageously telling your story. I totally agree with you that Elan is not the place to send your children. My parents were clueless and to this day, not that I bring it up anymore, they shut down anytime I bring up what happened to me there. My mother one time [...]

Straight Inc., Legacy of Torture as Treatment

April 26, 2011

Taken from Reddit Straight Inc., Legacy of Torture as Treatment I have ten friends who have committed suicide, we were all clients of Straight Inc. I consider myself a survivor. Between 1976 and 1993, as many as 50,000 kids in nine states were clients of this drug-rehabilitation center for teens. To progress through the program [...]

The Silence: On air and online April 19, 2011 at 9:00pm

April 19, 2011

FRONTLINE examines a little-known chapter of the Catholic Church sex abuse story — decades of abuse of Native Americans by priests and other church workers in Alaska. Through candid interviews with survivors, this FRONTLINE report focuses on the abuse by a number of men who worked for the Church along Alaska’s far west coast in [...]

Clips from Surviving Straight Inc.

April 14, 2011

Clips from the upcoming documentary Surviving Straight Inc.